How Meta’s Creativity Died After It Won the Internet?

Increasingly convinced that Meta no longer understands why people actually use its apps.
That might sound counterintuitive — after all, this is the company behind three of the most widely used platforms on the planet, each boasting billions of active users. You don’t reach that level of dominance without a deep understanding of human behavior, right?
But outside of following trends — Stories, short-form videos, disappearing messages — when was the last time Meta actually created something original? Something that didn’t already exist elsewhere before being adapted, refined, and rolled out to its massive user base?
In that sense, Zuckerberg and his team have proven to be less inventors and more master tacticians. They’ve ensured that no competing app can truly overtake them — either by acquiring potential rivals or by cloning their key features and distributing them at a global scale. It’s a brilliant defensive strategy: any new social media innovation can be swiftly absorbed, amplified, and ultimately rendered redundant.
Building a new platform today is nearly impossible, because Meta has already won the scale game. Its reach alone guarantees dominance.
Still, every once in a while, Meta decides to strike out on its own, introducing a new product it believes addresses some unmet user need. And almost every time, the result is the same — a quiet, underwhelming failure. Honestly, I can’t recall a single meaningful, homegrown innovation from Meta in the last five years.
Maybe Instagram Notes?
Yet Meta keeps trying. Take last week’s announcement: a new feature that scans the photos in your camera roll to suggest possible Facebook posts or Stories.
Sounds interesting? Not really. Nobody asked for that, and nobody’s going to use it. Give it a few months, and Meta will quietly phase it out.
What about the “OG Facebook” Friend Feed, meant to bring back the good old days of connecting with friends? Nostalgic, sure — but nobody’s posting personal updates anymore. The social pressure and fear of judgment have made that type of sharing obsolete. Facebook is now a Reels platform, and everyone knows it.
Celebrity chatbots? AI-generated “fantasy” scenarios through Meta AI? Facebook Avatars?
None of these have landed. Each one feels like a misread — a flawed interpretation of data that leads to the wrong conclusion about what users actually want.
People aren’t posting fewer personal updates because it’s hard to create them, or because they forget to. They’re not posting because they simply don’t want to. The novelty of public commentary from old acquaintances has worn off.
As for chatting with “AI versions” of celebrities — that entirely misses the point. The thrill of connecting with influencers is in the authenticity of the interaction. Simulated conversations strip that away completely.
And creativity? The biggest barrier isn’t access to tools — it’s having the time and inspiration to create something meaningful. Genuine creativity is rare. It’s why most people will never write a great book, produce a hit movie, or craft a viral post. That spark — the ability to truly resonate — is hard to replicate.
AI might make the process easier, but let’s be honest: most AI-generated content is going to be forgettable noise. Prompting users to “Imagine a space frog” doesn’t make anyone more creative; it just floods the feed with more clutter.
To Meta’s credit, the company excels at what it does best: defending its empire. It neutralizes threats through replication, dilution, and opportunism — a formula that’s kept it untouchable for years. Maybe originality isn’t even necessary when you’ve already won the distribution game.
Still, creativity and connection remain the beating heart of social media. And while Meta might be able to smother competitors through scale, it’s not leading with genuine innovation anymore.
That’s why Meta needs creators — real ones — to shape its next generation of experiences. It should be opening its AR and VR ecosystems to developers, encouraging experimentation and cultural input from outside its walls. Meta knows this, and to its credit, it has started to form partnerships in that direction.
But the in-house features it continues to roll out on Facebook and Instagram consistently miss the mark.
So what should Meta build?
Instead of more AI gimmicks, why not use that technology to help users form meaningful connections again — something that’s been lost along the way? Imagine AI-powered discovery tools that connect people with shared interests, local Reels feeds highlighting nearby creators, or creative collaboration features that help users remix music, build projects, or join communities together.
Social media was built on interaction — on the shared energy of connection and creativity. Meta’s current strategy, based purely on data patterns and simplified posting tools, ignores that essence. People don’t need more prompts to post; they need reasons to.
Perhaps, with its ad business thriving, Meta doesn’t see this as a problem worth solving. But if it genuinely wants to reignite activity beyond passive video consumption, it needs to rediscover what made social media special in the first place.
Until then, its new ideas will keep landing with the same dull thud — well-intentioned, well-funded, but entirely off the mark.
📢 If you're interested in Facebook Ads Account, don't hesitate to connect with us!
🔹 https://linktr.ee/Adshinepro
💬 We're always ready to assist you!